On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 11:18 -0500, Daniel Hyams wrote: > Sounds great! > > > One little comment though...and it's probably too late to suggest > it...maybe it should be called "multipackage" or something else > besides "multiprocess"? As soon as multiprocess is said, I think of > the standard Python module 'multiprocess', and think that either the > new version now supports that Python module, or that the new version > uses multiprocessing to speed up the build or similar.
It's not too late: we still need to update Makespec.py to generate MERGE() calls, the documentation, the website, etc. We used multiprocess as a branch name in SVN, but we're still in time to call it "multipackage" or whatever name we agree on. -- Giovanni Bajo :: [email protected] Develer S.r.l. :: http://www.develer.com My Blog: http://giovanni.bajo.it Last post: Compile-time Function Execution in D -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyInstaller" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en.
