I vote for multipackage. :D 2010/11/29 Giovanni Bajo <[email protected]>: > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 11:18 -0500, Daniel Hyams wrote: >> Sounds great! >> >> >> One little comment though...and it's probably too late to suggest >> it...maybe it should be called "multipackage" or something else >> besides "multiprocess"? As soon as multiprocess is said, I think of >> the standard Python module 'multiprocess', and think that either the >> new version now supports that Python module, or that the new version >> uses multiprocessing to speed up the build or similar. > > It's not too late: we still need to update Makespec.py to generate > MERGE() calls, the documentation, the website, etc. We used multiprocess > as a branch name in SVN, but we're still in time to call it > "multipackage" or whatever name we agree on. > > -- > Giovanni Bajo :: [email protected] > Develer S.r.l. :: http://www.develer.com > > My Blog: http://giovanni.bajo.it > Last post: Compile-time Function Execution in D > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PyInstaller" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyInstaller" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en.
