James Gardner wrote: > Hi guys, > >>>> Maybe you could try with the latest (0.5.12) version? > > I've rerun the tests with 0.5.12 and the difference is exactly the same. > FastCGI is 5 times *slower* than simple HTTP!
Someone mentioned caching -- are you sure that the HTTP server is getting all the requests? If Nginx is caching some responses and not passing them through, it will of course be much faster. > Perhaps you are proxying to multiple FastCGI backends which is of course > going to be faster than a single HTTP backend but you can also proxy to > multiple HTTP backends so that isn't comparing like with like. It shouldn't dramatically improve performance to use multiple FastCGI backends. Unless you have a SMP machine or something, which could change performance in all kinds of ways. -- Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blog.ianbicking.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
