Robert Leftwich wrote: > As I'm the one that said it was faster earlier in the thread, I think I > should > be the one to put the rumour to bed :-))
Sure. I've heard the same rumour in other places too though actually, particularly related to rails but also with Pylons eg: http://www.rkblog.rk.edu.pl/w/p/pylons-benchmark-various-servers/ > As mentioned in the earlier post, I was playing around with some preliminary > configurations on my laptop and it was faster using flup/fastcgi (via ab, not > wall clock). Interesting. I was using ab too. > I have been waiting for another server to be setup side by side at > my hosting company before I did any 'real' testing, as any testing done > outside > the host network just saturated the b/w I had available from my office > (nothing > faster than 128k ISDN where I live/work) w/o getting the server warmed up. OK, I was testing on localhost. > I > probably should have just kept my email shut until doing some real testing - > stay tuned. I look forward to the results. Could you let me know the platform you are on too please? Sometimes Debian etch is a bit weird! Cheers, James --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
