Spider wrote: > I think this reflects very positively on the WSGI-based approach of > Pylons.
We do too! TurboGears started a bit before WSGI really took hold, and as we all got further along, it seemed clear to most of us that we really needed to latch onto WSGI and build it into the foundation. The more we looked, the more we realized that Pylons was so very similar to TurboGears, with a few differences, except it already had WSGI at its core. Putting WSGI at the core of TurboGears after the fact would be much harder than just making a thin-layer on top of Pylons. Plus, now we get all the great benefits of Pylons itself, and get to participate in the great community that is growing around WSGI and Pylons. Very exciting stuff! -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
