On Jun 27, 6:23 pm, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if there's going to be a big push to address Pylon's marketing, I think > these are far more important than a logo.
Definitely. While the current look and feel might not be industry- best, it's well above the "credibility threshold" for a software project. If anyone decides against using Pylons it won't be because they didn't like the color of the website or the typeface of the logo, or thought the project was done by an 8 year old or abandoned years ago. I'd agree docs and presentation/organization are the key factors for growth at this point. Also things like weblogs; for example gathering pylons blogs or tagged posts like django's community page/feed does, things like that. Is there an obvious choice for a starter app using the default trinity(pylons/sa/mako)? Anyone have a petshop already written (ha!)? Various look and feel approaches can be applied in iterations on top of a site that does these things well... so that topic need not be abandoned, but shouldn't soak up all the bandwidth IMHO. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
