On Tue, 2008-08-01 at 14:05 -0600, Devin Torres wrote: > On Monday 07 January 2008 14:35:12 Mike Orr wrote: > > * There are three text-to-HTML helpers: 'htmlgen', 'textile', > > 'markdown'. Do we need all of these or can we standardize on one? > Do > > they even need to be in WebHelpers at all? The user could import > them > > separately. > webhelpers.rails.form_tag is laughably useless. > > > * Are you satisfied with Scriptaculous/Prototype? Which other > > Javascript libraries would you like to see in WebHelpers. Do you > use > > any of the 'webhelpers.rails.prototype' functions besides > > 'link_to_remote'? Ben wants to replace 'link_to_remote' with a > > function that has more client-side-Javascript, to avoid the > > inefficient eval of the JSON result. Are there any other functions > > which would be useful? > jQuery. Nobody uses Prototype or Scriptaculous anymore, jQuery's > simplicity fits in well with Pylons, and I find jQuery more Pythonic > than even Mochikit.
One caveat that I just hit: I love everything about jQuery except signal handling. Their signal handling does not work consistently across all browsers. In this regard MochiKit is IMHO still the best. I've wound up using jQuery for most things, and Mochi.Signal. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
