On 8 jan, 21:05, "Devin Torres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 14:35:12 Mike Orr wrote:>
(snip)
> > * Are you satisfied with Scriptaculous/Prototype? Which other
> > Javascript libraries would you like to see in WebHelpers. Do you use
> > any of the 'webhelpers.rails.prototype' functions besides
> > 'link_to_remote'? Ben wants to replace 'link_to_remote' with a
> > function that has more client-side-Javascript, to avoid the
> > inefficient eval of the JSON result. Are there any other functions
> > which would be useful?
>
> jQuery. Nobody uses Prototype or Scriptaculous anymore, jQuery's simplicity
> fits in well with Pylons, and I find jQuery more Pythonic than even
> Mochikit.
I haven't used Mochikit so far, but having used both prototype/
scriptaculous and jQuery on two recent projects, I *highly* recommend
jQuery. Anyway, I don't like this "link_to_remote" stuff since I try
my best to make my js unobtrusive.
My 2 cents...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
