chrism wrote > Its current state is completely functional, although it lacks a > configuration file format and parser (maybe one isn't needed, it'd > just be nice). I intend to work more on the documentation, although > it's not completely terrible now. > That makes it worse than AuthKit or mine middlewares because AuthKit relies on WSGI middleware architecture and you can put all configuration in one file.
Repoze looks like alien object attached to Pylons body. That's only mine opinion. I actually do not really understand what additional value you create with repoze. Please, don't take that as personal insult but take some of your time and explain the philosophy behind repoze. Regards, Dalius --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
