Have you ever compiled PIL on OS X? It's kind of a PITA. On Windows it's a
simple install exe. I've had more problems on my Mac with C libs than on my
Windows box/server at work. For Linux a lot of it depends on your
distribution. Calling it a "Windows problem" is just wrong.

- Justin

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Lawrence Oluyede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  You're discounting the "fun" effect: people want to see if they can
> >  accomplish it.  There is no "fork" of Pylons/Mako/Paste.  Merely
> >  people exploring the incompatibilities to see if the same package can
> >  be made compatible for both environments.
>
> Yes, exactly. I left out the "fun" effect because it would not be
> rational anymore :-)
> I agee with you for the most part but:
>
> >  The problem with C libraries is a lot bigger than just Google.  It
> >  frustrates users on Windows and Macintosh to no end, and many of them
> >  give up trying to install Pylons/lxml/ToscaWidgets/wxPython and go on
> >  to something else.  Precompiled binaries don't always exist, are too
> >  old, hard to find, or built with the wrong C compiler or Unicode
> >  width.
>
> This is, in my ideal world, a Windows problem, not a Python one. For
> the record: I use Linux and MacOSX day by day and never had issues
> with C libraries. I already know Windows is an entire different
> matter. For this and a lot of other reasons I don't use Windows at
> all, unless to test HTML pages with IE 6/7.
>
> BTW even if the developer likes Windows as his platform most of the
> deployment in the Python world is done on unix machine, at least in my
> side of the universe. I am not sure someone will go with (for example)
> (Django|Pylons|TG) + Apache2 + PostgreSQL on a Windows box as the
> server.
>
> In my opinion the "problem of the C libraries" is not as big as it
> seems. Just don't use Windows to develop, use it at home if you like
> it to surf, listen to music, play games :D
>
> >  That's why we didn't use lxml in the WebHelpers upgrade.  We looked
> >  and finally found a pure Python module that did what we need.
>
> I know and I don't blame you as developers of an entire framework.
> Losing compatibility with the most widespread platform is a shame but
> AFAIK there are lxml binaries, see:
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/lxml/2.0.3
>
> --
> Lawrence, stacktrace.it - oluyede.org - neropercaso.it
> "It is difficult to get a man to understand
> something when his salary depends on not
> understanding it" - Upton Sinclair
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to