>From general chat on #pylons a lot of people prefer to proxy, or simply run paster.
In my deployment Paster is serving directly to the world. I'm not sure anyone has taken up a comparison in the ways you speak of, at least I have not come across it. I'm sure it would be a welcomed test. On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a little unclear on the better ways to deploy a Pylons app. > > My production servers run nginx -- is it better to use some fastcgi > support (if so, how?) or just do a "paster serve" and proxy to that > port? > > I've read a handful of ways on how-to-deploy apps, and all seem > different. I've yet to see a comparison or "this is THE way to do it" > document. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
