The differences in speed on webapps are usually entirely due to
blocking at the database level.  I think a good comparison would be
someone driving a 40yr old cadillac and a new sports car in a 5mph
school zone lined with cop cars-- it doesn't matter what's under the
hood, you're going 5mph.

Pylons and RoR are very similar, and also very not.  Pylons is very
'extensible' and allows for more interaction/control of the
developer.  RoR has a lot of 'magic', which translates to things
needing to be done in certain ways.  Rails apps are often slow -- not
because of Ruby, but because of Rails.  I think Pylons might be a bit
more similar to Merb.

In any event , my suggestion is this:

- if your lead guy is a Rails programmer, find a new lead guy

- if your lead guy is a Ruby programmer, and he thinks that the app
makes sense in Rails or Merb - stick to them and avoid the pitfalls of
learning new stuff.

- in all other situations, Pylons or Django might just be a great
fit!  maybe they want to try something new, or they know that its
going to be a PITA to get rails to do what you want.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to