On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT), Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > would you want a desktop client to have 'all' operation and access to > the objects methods and fields?
In principal, no; only an explicitly exposed subset. But, in practice, and as I am only just mentally exploring this idea, I do not really care if the exposing mechanism forces that all attributes and methods be exposed -- some way to limit that can always be layered on top later. Similarly, for the sake of toying with the idea, the many security issues may just be ignored. Note that the client may be any that supports rpc, so it could be desktop just as well as web. But, what makes think that this difference is important? mario --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
