On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:47 AM, mario ruggier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT), Jonathan Vanasco > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > would you want a desktop client to have 'all' operation and access to > > the objects methods and fields? > > In principal, no; only an explicitly exposed subset. > > But, in practice, and as I am only just mentally exploring this idea, I do > not really care if the exposing mechanism forces that all attributes and > methods be exposed -- some way to limit that can always be layered on top > later. > > Similarly, for the sake of toying with the idea, the many security issues > may just be ignored. Note that the client may be any that supports rpc, so > it could be desktop just as well as web. > > But, what makes think that this difference is important? I was looking into this kind of architecture a little while back and while I ultimately never found the time to pursue it, one very promising option is to wire up a dojo.data adapter [1] to SQLAlchemy -- there may even be an effort under way to do so through rum [2]. [1] http://dojotoolkit.org/book/dojo-book-0-9/part-3-programmatic-dijit-and-dojo/what-dojo-data/available-stores/dojo-data-item [2] http://toscawidgets.org/documentation/rum/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
