On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Tycon <[email protected]> wrote: > > to me it seems like a waste of time to deal with some poorly written, > poorly documented, poorly supported > library that someone wrote with not much effort. Funny thing people > spend way more time trying to figure out and > use these libraries then either the time it took to write them or the > time they can write their own (or use something > better). "Tosca" especially is silly since there are many more serious > widget libraries such as YUI.
I can see your frustration, and yes some of them are hard to get when you start, but calling them a waste of effort isn't right. For example. Your ToscaWidgets assertion is totally wrong, YUI is a client-side library, while TW is server-side. So learn before you criticize. So I suggest you either keep the discussion to "how can they be improved" or "asking smart questions" or simply stop posting because this is trollish behavior. As you bring nothing productive. Last but not least this is pylons, over here everything is optional. No one told you to use any of them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
