Tycon wrote:
> So no one is using this decorator for https ??
> I guess it's only required for serious e-commerce websites, maybe
> there are no such pylons apps
>   

Pylons is used for quite a few hip and serious websites (listed at the 
pylons wiki if you'd care to look it up) though my guess is that you 
already know that and the provocative innuendo is just a (quite 
un-original) technique to  prompt a quick response. Anyway, a can think 
of a few causes for the lack of answers so far:

1) No one is using that decorator.
2) Someone is using but not in an action requiring query string parameters.
3) People are achieving the same effect with different techniques
4) People in a position to fix have aren't reading this 'cause they've 
taken some days off given that new-years' has been on a Thursday (eg: 
myself. However,  my life's so sad that I'm at home on a Friday night, 
with my girlfirend, my cat, my Citadelle gin tonic, and my laptop; with 
obviously nothing better to do than feed some random internet troll)
5) People in a position to fix this are out of patience and have decided 
to ignore your posts.

#1 I doubt since people don't usually submit code for the sake of it. #3 
wouldn't be a surprise since the Pylons usually targeted to developers 
who have already a well equipped toolbox around. I'll place my bets on a 
combination of #3&#4 (#3.5?),  I believe it's too early for #5 yet, 
though you're approaching it a good speed...

Now seriously. You've found a bug, congratulations and thanks That's 
already 2 in less than a week which is quire remarkable and it's 
certainly preferable an out-of-tone bug report than none at all. 
However, I think you'd be more positively considered around here if 
instead of bitching around you'd showed at least a little appreciation 
for the software you're using for free to build a serious e-commerce 
website which will probably bring you some revenue. Bonus points if you 
submit a patch for the bug you've found (you've already proved that 
you're perfectly capable of doing so) through the conventional channels 
(the bug tracker is usually the best place) and a unit-test for it if 
you feel extra-generous.

Thanks,
Alberto

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to