> Pylons is used for quite a few hip and serious websites (listed at the > pylons wiki if you'd care to look it up) though my guess is that you
Which of those sites do you consider hip and/or serious ? On Jan 2, 4:26 pm, Alberto Valverde <[email protected]> wrote: > Tycon wrote: > > So no one is using this decorator for https ?? > > I guess it's only required for serious e-commerce websites, maybe > > there are no such pylons apps > > Pylons is used for quite a few hip and serious websites (listed at the > pylons wiki if you'd care to look it up) though my guess is that you > already know that and the provocative innuendo is just a (quite > un-original) technique to prompt a quick response. Anyway, a can think > of a few causes for the lack of answers so far: > > 1) No one is using that decorator. > 2) Someone is using but not in an action requiring query string parameters. > 3) People are achieving the same effect with different techniques > 4) People in a position to fix have aren't reading this 'cause they've > taken some days off given that new-years' has been on a Thursday (eg: > myself. However, my life's so sad that I'm at home on a Friday night, > with my girlfirend, my cat, my Citadelle gin tonic, and my laptop; with > obviously nothing better to do than feed some random internet troll) > 5) People in a position to fix this are out of patience and have decided > to ignore your posts. > > #1 I doubt since people don't usually submit code for the sake of it. #3 > wouldn't be a surprise since the Pylons usually targeted to developers > who have already a well equipped toolbox around. I'll place my bets on a > combination of #3 (#3.5?), I believe it's too early for #5 yet, > though you're approaching it a good speed... > > Now seriously. You've found a bug, congratulations and thanks That's > already 2 in less than a week which is quire remarkable and it's > certainly preferable an out-of-tone bug report than none at all. > However, I think you'd be more positively considered around here if > instead of bitching around you'd showed at least a little appreciation > for the software you're using for free to build a serious e-commerce > website which will probably bring you some revenue. Bonus points if you > submit a patch for the bug you've found (you've already proved that > you're perfectly capable of doing so) through the conventional channels > (the bug tracker is usually the best place) and a unit-test for it if > you feel extra-generous. > > Thanks, > Alberto --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
