I haven't tried python 3, but I heard its performance is still lagging compared to 2.6, in addition to the compatibility issues. So I don't see any reason to try to upgrade to it at the moment.
On Jan 10, 11:43 pm, Tycon <[email protected]> wrote: > I performed some benchmarks on python 2.5 vs 2.6, using requests for > simple pages as well as complex pages (with two-level db access) and > I noticed python 2.6 gives about 4-5% better performance as shown in > the request per second throughput. But python 2.6 is not yet > available as a standard package in most linux distributions (e.g. > debian), so I had to compile and install that from source, although I > usually prefer to use the official debian packages. But I though that > this consistent and noticeable small performance imporovment was worth > it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
