On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Previously Dalius Dobravolskas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Roberto Allende <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > My motivation is to write a unit testing but even in other cases it > > > could have sense to use a controller function isolated. Or at least in > > > my case, this is the only restriction. > > > > If your intention is unit-testing do it Pylons way: > > http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/pylonsdocs/Unit+Testing > > That is not unit testing, that is functional testing. What's the difference except that your way might be a little bit more-efficient (like 20%)? I have seen several different ways of unit-testing pylons applications but basically they just help to do the same. What makes unit-testing functional testing in your opinion? -- Dalius http://blog.sandbox.lt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
