Wichert Akkerman escribió: > Previously Dalius Dobravolskas wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Roberto Allende <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> My motivation is to write a unit testing but even in other cases it >>> could have sense to use a controller function isolated. Or at least in >>> my case, this is the only restriction. >>> >> If your intention is unit-testing do it Pylons way: >> http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/pylonsdocs/Unit+Testing >> > > That is not unit testing, that is functional testing. > > If you want to unit test your controller and run it in isolation you > need to do a bit of setup work in your test case. I use this: >
Thanks a lot Wiggy, your mails were very helpful. Although, it seems we're using different versions of Pylons (or i'm doing smt wrong) because following your approach i also needed wsgiapp variables Buffet, g and session at least. Just for the record, i'm using 0.9.6.2. By the other hand, in pylons.wsgiapp there's a method called load_test_env wich seems to use a test environment. If we're able to use that instead, we wouldn't be using a mock object but at least, we would use a test environment. I'll keep trying. Thanks again! Kind Regards r. -- http://menttes.com http://robertoallende.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
