Nice to hear that either choice is somewhat equal. I will test the proxy setup in a virtual machine some day, which I already use to test my apps before uploading them to production site.
Frank On Wednesday 22 July 2009 09:40:36 Iain Duncan wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 08:59 +0200, Frank Broniewski wrote: > > Hello Graham, > > > > thank you very much for your detailed response. I find it very helpful. > > > > > FWIW, you will find that Pylons folks would tend to recommend you run > > > each with a separate Paste server instance behind mod_proxy of your > > > preferred web server. > > > > I know the concept as it is mentioned alot in the docs, but I never > > understood why I should use one webserver to contact another to serve my > > documents. But I am not a pro so I probably do not know the full story > > behind this. Nevertheless I intend to use only apache to serve my python > > apps. > > IMHO it's really six-of-one, half-a-dozen of the other. I've mostly used > the proxy setup in the past with TG but am definitely going to use > mod_wsgi for my upcoming production sites. I personally would recommend > trying out both at it's useful to understand how to do it both ways and > sometimes I've found it handy to use the proxy for checking out staging > and testing installs without having to touch your production apache > instance for example. > > my two cents! > iain > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
