On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 21:56 -0700, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > On Aug 24, 2:38 am, Iain Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sorry, I totally disagree. The above may be true for Django, or for the > > average person purchasing a Mac, but it is expressly *not true* for > > Pylons. The Pylons target user is *not* someone looking for > > plug-and-play. You may be, that's fine, but if so, you are probably > > looking in the wrong place ( Django or Rails would be much better for > > that ). > > Has anyone thought of marketing Pylons as a way to grow a Django app ?
Actually, Ben has said exactly that before, thought I can't remember where, I think maybe his blog? That's the kind of thing I'm just saying should appear more prominently on the Pylons web site. That said, I don't think making direct digs on Django is such a great plan, but in the blog post Ben did a great job of pointing out that Pylons has been popular for people who have prototyped large apps on Django or Rails and were looking for the long term foundation. Iain > > In my experience, Django/Rails... and even ORM stuff like SqlAlchemy > are great at getting a project on its feet... and then they're a f'ing > nightmare to grow and scale out of their design patterns. > > That's why I like Pylons. It's so much more lower-level and easier to > swap stuff around in. It's also very responsive to quick changes. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
