On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:34 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: > blflamme wrote: > > I must agree that pyramid_pylons is not a good name to use because now > we'll get 3 levels of explanations and it's event more confusing: > > How about 'pyramid_pylonsish' ? Then we can define "pylonsish" as > "like Pylons 1".
"pylamid"? "pyralons"? Both of those sound like VD. :-( - C -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
