On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Chris McDonough <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:34 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: >> blflamme wrote: >> > I must agree that pyramid_pylons is not a good name to use because now >> we'll get 3 levels of explanations and it's event more confusing: >> >> How about 'pyramid_pylonsish' ? Then we can define "pylonsish" as >> "like Pylons 1". > > "pylamid"? > > "pyralons"? > > Both of those sound like VD. :-(
Well, we could come up with a new name for Pylons-style applications. But I don't know what. Any Egyptian ideas out there? -- Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
