Mike Orr wrote:
In 2005 MVC for the web was still a shiny new idea. But in the following six years people used it and discovered its limitations and blogged about it. Namely, that MVC was designed for an environment very different from the web, it fits web applications imperfectly, and people sometimes agonize how to shoehorn their app into the formalities of MVC, which is counterproductive. Anybody who studies MVC will come across these complaints, and will see that the current generation of browsers is going "beyond MVC". That should reassure them that Pyramid isn't being substandard by doing this.
Could you give an example of such case (where MV is better than MVC for a web app)? Or a link to some blog post. I, by no means, want to start a flame war or argue that what you stated is not true. I'm just unexperienced and curious ;)
-- Juliusz Gonera http://juliuszgonera.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
