On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 11:50 +0100, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: > Am 18.02.2011 17:46 schrieb Chris McDonough: > > On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 06:46 -0800, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > >> 1. I think it would be better if everything related to Pyramid/Pylons > >> were on a single system ( ie: GitHub or BitBucket ). > > > > I'd like that too, but not everyone is comfortable with a single system. > > You mean not everyone is comfortable with the same saystem. Having to > switch between different systems makes me feel even more uncomfortable > than having to work with a *single* system which is not my favorite one.
Join the club. > Btw, is there a clear reason why you are using Git and not Mercurial? To > simplify collaboration, TG is now also using Git, but I noticed some > people were not happy with this - many Python developers seem to prefer > Mercurial (maybe because it is written in Python and also used for > Python itself). Not that I want to switch again and I can also see > several reasons for preferig Git, just curious whether you have other > sensible reasons to use Git. There wasn't much reasoning put into it except that bitbucket goes down a lot, and for Armin GitHub led to more followers. But it wasn't like we sat down with a spreadsheet. Whichever choice we made is going to be wrong for some number of people. I wish at least two version control systems would die. At this point I hope those are mercurial and bzr. ;-) - C -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
