On 28 August 2012 21:20, Iain Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Malthe. I had been hoping that a pure object database would make the > data modelling a lot simpler. Can you weigh in on how much the above issues > would be a problem? Like is it so bad that I just abandon the idea and > figure it out in SQLAlchemy, which I know well?
I think if you've got a write concurrency requirement > 10 per second – sustained – then you'll be unhappy with ZODB in its current implementation. It's entirely possible to write an object database like ZODB that supports much more than the concurrency threshold suggested above, but nobody has stepped up. \malthe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
