Thanks, much appreciated! Iain On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Malthe Borch <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 August 2012 21:20, Iain Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Malthe. I had been hoping that a pure object database would make > the > > data modelling a lot simpler. Can you weigh in on how much the above > issues > > would be a problem? Like is it so bad that I just abandon the idea and > > figure it out in SQLAlchemy, which I know well? > > I think if you've got a write concurrency requirement > 10 per second > – sustained – then you'll be unhappy with ZODB in its current > implementation. > > It's entirely possible to write an object database like ZODB that > supports much more than the concurrency threshold suggested above, but > nobody has stepped up. > > \malthe > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
