I am pleased to announce the release of PyLucene 2.0 following the
release of Java Lucene 2.0 yesterday.
This release is built from the Java Lucene 2.0.0 tag [1].
Great to hear that!
Binaries for Mac OS X (both PPC and Intel), Linux (Gentoo) and Windows
are available. See http://pylucene.osafoundation.org for more details.
Apart from the changes between Java Lucene 1.9.1 and Java Lucene 2.0
[2] which are reflected in PyLucene 2.0, the major new feature in
PyLucene 2.0 is that it no longer uses SWIG. The API wrappers are now
handcoded in C++.
When you started writing your wrappers, did you consider the
Boost.Python system? I'm considering it for some stuff of my own, but
haven't looked at it much. Is there a glaring technical shortcoming
that makes it unsuitable for PyLucene (or other large projects), or did
you just not want to introduce excessive dependencies on PyLucene?
_______________________________________________
pylucene-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
