Hello, Andi. AV> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Yura Smolsky wrote:
>> AV> Maybe the index was already optimized ? >> >> it was not optimized. is there incapability between old version of >> Lucene and new one? AV> If there is it should be just as with Java Lucene. AV> My understanding is that Lucene 2.0 should be able to read 1.4.3 indexes. AV> I'm not sure it should be able to write them. To find out for sure, you should AV> ask [email protected] Actually Lucene (java) optimized it fine. And PyLucene does not want to perform any changes at all on the same index. Index is huge (40Gb) so I cannot pack it and send to you :) I will try to reproduce this thing on a smaller one. -- Yura Smolsky, http://altervisionmedia.com/ _______________________________________________ pylucene-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
