On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Yura Smolsky wrote:
Hello, Andi.
AV> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Yura Smolsky wrote:
AV> Maybe the index was already optimized ?
it was not optimized. is there incapability between old version of
Lucene and new one?
AV> If there is it should be just as with Java Lucene.
AV> My understanding is that Lucene 2.0 should be able to read 1.4.3 indexes.
AV> I'm not sure it should be able to write them. To find out for sure, you
should
AV> ask [email protected]
Actually Lucene (java) optimized it fine. And PyLucene does not want
to perform any changes at all on the same index. Index is huge (40Gb)
so I cannot pack it and send to you :) I will try to reproduce this
thing on a smaller one.
Maybe the process is failing silently ?
What version of gcj did you use to build PyLucene ?
There are file size limits (2 or 4 gb) with gcj < 4.x
Andi..
_______________________________________________
pylucene-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
