Hi Simon, 2007/10/3, Simon Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:56:36 +0200 > "Carl Friedrich Bolz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > to which nobody replied about the RCTypes issue. > > > > Note that I think it is fine to discuss the issue even now. But it is > > very strange in my opinion to say now that it was never discussed. > > No, I'm not talking about rctypes i'm talking about ctypes. > I am fine with rm'ing all rctypes code. > I just use a function from rctypes to find a library, i think > rffi has such a function now..
Then it should be possible to use the function that rffi provides? > Do people realize that genrffi allows ctypes (nothing to do with rctypes) > to be used as a front-end to rffi ? Ie. instead of using ctypes > (in ll2ctypes) as a backend to rffi. No, I was not aware of this. There never was neither a mail to this list about this, nor a sprint report about the Vilnius sprint, so how should people that didn't go there know? Cheers, Carl Friedrich _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
