Samuele Pedroni wrote: > Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote: >> I am not sure it is practical to put parts of PyPy under this agreement. >> Which parts would that be? All of it (which would be hard, since we need >> to find all contributors and have them sign it)? Only the new bits which >> are rather useless by themselves? >> > the rule as such makes most sense if the code is going into the Open JDK > itself, > I'm not sure how it would apply to stuff in another codebase that uses > the Open JDK.
The problem is that all entries into the open JDK challenge have to be put under the contributor agreement. I agree that it might not make sense for PyPy since it is not going into the JDK. But that is what the rules are. Maybe we should send a mail asking whether other models might be possible. Cheers, Carl Friedrich _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
