onsdagen den 20 februari 2008 skrev Carl Friedrich Bolz: > Jacob Hallén wrote: > > onsdagen den 20 februari 2008 skrev Carl Friedrich Bolz: > >> Samuele Pedroni wrote: > >>> Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote: > >>>> I am not sure it is practical to put parts of PyPy under this > >>>> agreement. Which parts would that be? All of it (which would be hard, > >>>> since we need to find all contributors and have them sign it)? Only > >>>> the new bits which are rather useless by themselves? > >>> > >>> the rule as such makes most sense if the code is going into the Open > >>> JDK itself, > >>> I'm not sure how it would apply to stuff in another codebase that uses > >>> the Open JDK. > >> > >> The problem is that all entries into the open JDK challenge have to be > >> put under the contributor agreement. I agree that it might not make > >> sense for PyPy since it is not going into the JDK. But that is what the > >> rules are. Maybe we should send a mail asking whether other models might > >> be possible. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Carl Friedrich > > > > No, this is not quite true. You need to sign the contributor agreement, > > but that agreement only covers what goes into the Sun codebase. Wether > > they want to support something that goes into another codebase is an open > > question. > > Please read the challenge rules at: > http://openjdk.java.net/challenge/rules/ > > Section 3 states: > > B. The Entry, in its entirety, must be contributed under the terms of > the SCA. > > Cheers, > > Carl Friedrich
Ok, I stand corrected. I just read what was said in conjunction with the SCA. Then it seems to make no sense to submit. Jacob _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
