Jacob Hallén wrote: > onsdagen den 20 februari 2008 skrev Carl Friedrich Bolz: >> Samuele Pedroni wrote: >>> Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote: >>>> I am not sure it is practical to put parts of PyPy under this agreement. >>>> Which parts would that be? All of it (which would be hard, since we need >>>> to find all contributors and have them sign it)? Only the new bits which >>>> are rather useless by themselves? >>> the rule as such makes most sense if the code is going into the Open JDK >>> itself, >>> I'm not sure how it would apply to stuff in another codebase that uses >>> the Open JDK. >> The problem is that all entries into the open JDK challenge have to be >> put under the contributor agreement. I agree that it might not make >> sense for PyPy since it is not going into the JDK. But that is what the >> rules are. Maybe we should send a mail asking whether other models might >> be possible. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Carl Friedrich > > No, this is not quite true. You need to sign the contributor agreement, but > that agreement only covers what goes into the Sun codebase. Wether they want > to support something that goes into another codebase is an open question.
Please read the challenge rules at: http://openjdk.java.net/challenge/rules/ Section 3 states: B. The Entry, in its entirety, must be contributed under the terms of the SCA. Cheers, Carl Friedrich _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
