On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Armin Rigo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Bea During <[email protected]> wrote: >> Maybe we should be clear in our documentation somewhere on >> where we stand regarding RPython > > What about renaming it first? There is at least one other project > that uses the name RPython. What about something like InterpPy or > InterpPython to make it clear that it's supposed to be used to write > interpreters? It doesn't sound terrific but I don't really care -- > so, comments welcome, but please no infinite discussion on the pros > and cons of various names. >
While we're at it, how about splitting the translation toolchain from pypy interpreter? I don't mean on technical merits, it can still be the same or mostly the same source codebase, but more on the conceptual level, to have 2 different websites names etc. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
