On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:50 +0200, Antonio Cuni wrote: > On 13/09/10 10:27, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > > > Is it really about interpreters? (what's interpreter-specific after > > all in RPython) or is it just that it's hard to use and does not > > integrate with CPython well? > > my point if that it's definitely good enough for writing interpreters. For the > rest, it's a bit unknown (in the sense that nobody has ever tried), and we > don't care about knowing :-)
People have written apps and libs in RPython at several points in its history. And while i find it perfectly acceptable and fine for PyPy core devs to not want to care for usage of RPython for non-interpreter purposes i am a bit tired of this ever ongoing competition of expressing dis-interest and uttering discouraging statements. best, holger _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
