I believe Hart's Antler has done quite bit of work in RPython. Yeah, that said, more work to do there.
My goal with my RPython thread, is that I believe that there is an implicitly static subset of Python that can be compiled into standalone executables and DLLs without needing JIT or VMs. Can serve 2 purposes. 1. Make standalone executables just like C/C++ code. 2. Write Python Extension modules that can be compiled into shared DLL modules for CPython and PyPy Looking through the various threads on PyPy, Shedskin and Cython, I believe its just a matter of time. Sarvi ----- Original Message ---- > From: Antonio Cuni <[email protected]> > To: Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Armin Rigo <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 1:50:34 AM > Subject: Re: [pypy-dev] External RPython mailing list > > On 13/09/10 10:27, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > > > Is it really about interpreters? (what's interpreter-specific after > > all in RPython) or is it just that it's hard to use and does not > > integrate with CPython well? > > my point if that it's definitely good enough for writing interpreters. For the > rest, it's a bit unknown (in the sense that nobody has ever tried), and we > don't care about knowing :-) > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
