On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Isaac Gouy <igo...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > --- On Wed, 4/6/11, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -snip- > >> > CPython bugs - How strange that the CPython bug was >> never mentioned! - maybe. >> > >> >> Ok. The bug was not mentioned because it takes time to >> decide "it's a bug". > > > I know someone decided "it's a bug" because someone said so in a blog post > they pushed out across the blogosphere and proggit and Hacker News and ... > > How strange that CPython bug was never mentioned to me! > > >> Since programs that only compile on GCC clearly >> are. >> > >> > How many C language implementations are shown? >> > >> > How many Python language implementations are shown? >> > >> > If only one Python language implementation was shown >> do you think it would be PyPy ? >> > >> >> I can't really read your mind, but from my opinion if the >> question is "how fast Python programs can be run" then the >> answer is Yes. > > The Help page says something about showing working programs written in less > familiar programming languages. >
Ok, will look it up later. > >> So the position is that GCC is allowed to use extensions >> because it's the only C implementation shown and PyPy is not, >> because all Python programs should run on each runtime, is that >> correct? > > I don't see a way to compare CPython and PyPy unless the comparison programs > do at least run on both CPython and PyPy (and x86 and x64). > Well I can always write a program that runs on both (and uses more efficient data structure for pypy for example). The question is a bit academic, because I don't have any particular implementation now in mind. But would be cool to be able to do that. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
