On 2012-05-04, at 3:06 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote: > On 05/04/2012 09:05 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote: >> On 2012-05-04, at 2:57 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote: >> >>> personally i think unless you find a proper way to deal with the git has no >>> named branches thing, this is a no-go >> >> Um, what is "named branches" thing that git apparently doesn't have? > > named branches are branches that are part of the history > git branches are only pointers, not part of the history
OK. And why is it a 'no-go' for a mirror (not a repository that core pypy devs working with)? - Yury _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
