Yury: No idea -- seems like it should work just fine to me =).
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Yury Selivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-05-04, at 3:06 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote: > >> On 05/04/2012 09:05 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote: >>> On 2012-05-04, at 2:57 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote: >>> >>>> personally i think unless you find a proper way to deal with the git has >>>> no named branches thing, this is a no-go >>> >>> Um, what is "named branches" thing that git apparently doesn't have? >> >> named branches are branches that are part of the history >> git branches are only pointers, not part of the history > > OK. And why is it a 'no-go' for a mirror (not a repository that core pypy > devs working with)? > > - > Yury > _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
