its not a no go for a mirror,
*I* consider it a no-go for the 2-way sync Michael suggested
On 05/05/2012 03:09 AM, Michael Blume wrote:
Yury: No idea -- seems like it should work just fine to me =).
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Yury Selivanov<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2012-05-04, at 3:06 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote:
On 05/04/2012 09:05 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
On 2012-05-04, at 2:57 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote:
personally i think unless you find a proper way to deal with the git has no
named branches thing, this is a no-go
Um, what is "named branches" thing that git apparently doesn't have?
named branches are branches that are part of the history
git branches are only pointers, not part of the history
OK. And why is it a 'no-go' for a mirror (not a repository that core pypy devs
working with)?
-
Yury
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
