On Wednesday 06 May 2009 12:30:02 Henrik Pauli wrote: > Hmm... I think strictly said, the licensing of the final product and the > development model do not have anything to do with each other. Afterall, > it’s not LGPL per se that made Qt’s development model more open, that’s > just a separate, just well timed decision.
With Qt this is not the case, it has a very firm stance about development model and it's relation to the final product license. Legally, you cannot start development with a non-commercial Qt license (either community/GPL or LGPL) and then switch over to commercial on product release. I believe this is why Phil made the licensing change he mentioned - so at least with a commercial license of PyQt you can use the LGPL version of Qt and still make a commercial product. IANAL, correct me if I'm wrong. _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
