On Wednesday 06 May 2009 20:58:12 Alberto Berti wrote: > >>>>> "A Corsaire" == A Corsaire <[email protected]> writes: > > Phil>> First off, many thanks for not pestering me about this - it is > Phil>> greatly appreciated. > Phil>> > Phil>> In a nutshell, the PyQt licensing will not be changed in the > Phil>> short term. > > Corsaire> that Python misses out on PyQt becoming > Corsaire> the de-facto standard GUI library we sorely > Corsaire> need. > > Differently from you, i'm quite fine with PyQt licensing as it is now > and i hope that Phil will have time and resources to continue its great > work. > > What's i don't understand is the reason for not publishing a read only > repository with the gpl code and even better also a bugtracker that > allows developers and distribution packagers to track bugs and if and > when their fix was applied to the sources. > > It seems to me that this would be a great help for the community and > little effort for Phil and co. and the same time i don't see how it can > damage Phil's business. > > The question raised already, but never receved a response. > > If this is just a problem about resources to setup and maintain it i can > help with this. I even checked the possibility to apply all the history > of the snapshots to a repo in the hope of tracking code changes, but > older snapshots where unavailable last time i tried. Phil, please, could > you share your thougts on this, frankly? > > azazel > > _______________________________________________ > PyQt mailing list [email protected] > http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
Even a read-only svn would be a big help for me and would save a lot of time and bandwidth for some users. Would be helpful for debugging and submitting patches. Matt _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
