My comment on the issue: http://code-blasphemies.blogspot.com/2009/05/pyqt-still-on-gpl.html
In short: good choice! 2009/5/12 Simon Edwards <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > A Corsaire wrote: >> I do think that this is a >> >> worst-case outcome for the Python community as a whole. It means that PyQt >> development won't open up and become more community driven, that we (and >> other customers) still have to worry about the >> what-if-Phil-gets-hit-by-a-bus scenario, > > Is this the classic "What happens to my FOSS / closed source application if > Riverbank disappears?" problem? (Also known as Bus Factor 1) How big is the > concern seriously? This sounds like the same situation that KDE was in when > Qt was QPL/GPL, incidentally. > > cheers, > > -- > Simon Edwards | KDE-NL, Guidance tools, Guarddog Firewall > [email protected] | http://www.simonzone.com/software/ > Nijmegen, The Netherlands | "ZooTV? You made the right choice." > _______________________________________________ > PyQt mailing list [email protected] > http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt > -- Filip Gruszczyński _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
