> Hi Floris, > > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 2:25 PM Floris Bruynooghe <f...@devork.be> wrote: > > > Why the rules about active? Seems complicated and more open to > > arguing. I liked the Pillow guidelines you linked: > > https://github.com/orgs/pytest-dev/teams/contributors can express > > interest and https://github.com/orgs/pytest-dev/teams/core decides on > > split (which I guess can be anything from 0% to 100%). With the same > > assumption that the core members are reasonable that should end up as > > roughly the same. > > > > Mind you in practice I have no issue with the above proposal of people > > right now, but would also not mind if e.g. hpk or ronny wanted to be > > part right now (I'll pass myself). Likewise there are probably cases > > where I wouldn't mind people not in core being paid for some time. > > > > I wrote those "rules" just to come up with a solid proposal in the e-mail, > but I do like yours better. Letting developers opt-in to a share is fair > and reasonable, certainly. > > I think we should even always split the funding evenly between those opting > to receive it, to further avoid any arguing on that. > > But in general I'm +1, let's make it happen if there's anyone interested > > in getting paid. > > > > Great, let's see what others think. > > Cheers, > Bruno.
I think TideLift seems like a good step in the right direction -- also agree on the "active" bit being the most difficult to resolve here -- where possible let's adhere to the simplest-as-possible here -- I like the opt-in approach proposed above :thumbsup: Anthony _______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list pytest-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
