Am 06.05.19 um 16:03 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
Hi Ronny,
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 11:09 AM Ronny Pfannschmidt
<opensou...@ronnypfannschmidt.de
<mailto:opensou...@ronnypfannschmidt.de>> wrote:
i think its a good idea to have this as a opt-in.
Currently a Fair Share Mechanism on a opt in basis seems fair,
if we ever hit a situation where someone could have a reasonably
set up part/full-time position primarily on pytest we should take
a look at how division is fair in that case.
Agreed, thanks Ronny.
If nobody objects, I plan to move this forward later this week.
One question is how do we track which maintainers are opting to
receive funding.
I'm thinking of opening an issue which lists the contributors
receiving the funding; maintainers are then free to post a comment
indicating if they want to start/stop receiving funding, at which
point we update the original post. Another option would be to use the
Wiki, but we don't receive change notifications so there's a chance of
we getting out of sync with the configuration on Tidelift. Suggestions?
we should make a git repo where we track meta level documentation,
that way we chould have a ci with credentials run the checks
i wonder if tidelift hasn an api published for that
Another question is regarding admins of the Tidelift dashboard. I
volunteer to do it, but would like more people to also be admins to
reduce the bus factor, so other volunteers are appreciated as well.
in about 2-3 Months i can Commit to such role as well.
Cheers Ronny
Cheers,
Bruno.
-- Ronny
Am 03.05.19 um 14:11 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
Hi Floris,
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 2:25 PM Floris Bruynooghe <f...@devork.be
<mailto:f...@devork.be>> wrote:
Why the rules about active? Seems complicated and more open to
arguing. I liked the Pillow guidelines you linked:
https://github.com/orgs/pytest-dev/teams/contributors can express
interest and https://github.com/orgs/pytest-dev/teams/core
decides on
split (which I guess can be anything from 0% to 100%). With
the same
assumption that the core members are reasonable that should
end up as
roughly the same.
Mind you in practice I have no issue with the above proposal
of people
right now, but would also not mind if e.g. hpk or ronny
wanted to be
part right now (I'll pass myself). Likewise there are
probably cases
where I wouldn't mind people not in core being paid for some
time.
I wrote those "rules" just to come up with a solid proposal in
the e-mail, but I do like yours better. Letting developers opt-in
to a share is fair and reasonable, certainly.
I think we should even always split the funding evenly between
those opting to receive it, to further avoid any arguing on that.
But in general I'm +1, let's make it happen if there's anyone
interested
in getting paid.
Great, let's see what others think.
Cheers,
Bruno.
_______________________________________________
pytest-dev mailing list
pytest-dev@python.org <mailto:pytest-dev@python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
_______________________________________________
pytest-dev mailing list
pytest-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
