On 3/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Suggestion: Make this PEP 3001 and start any Py3k PEPs from 3100.... > > Guido> I already proposed that numbering scheme. More formally, Py3k > Guido> meta PEPs go between 3001 and 3099, and feature PEPs start at > Guido> 3100 (and hopefully we won't have to overflow into 4000 :-). > > Should there be some distinction between Py3k PEPs which fall under the > purview of Steven's PEP and those which contain completely new stuff and > aren't going to impact Python 2.x code?
I don't think there are enough dimensions in the numbering scheme to indicate all possible distinctions. IOW, no. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com