On 4/29/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An example of how this will change current code would be good. E.g., > > ``o->ob_type->tp_name`` becomes ``PyType(o)->typ_name`` or > > ``o->ob_base->ob_type->tp_name``. > > > > Otherwise I am all for cleaning up the codebase and thus support this PEP. > > Thanks for the suggestions, I have add them all into PEP 3123. > > I also changed the PEP title, to reflect that PyObject_HEAD is > maintained for compatibility. >
Are we going to have a preference over PyObject_HEAD or defining the struct field directly? -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
