On 5/1/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/1/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rationale > > =========
> That makes absolutely no sense. You mean to tell me that people write > Python without being able to understand any of the language's > keywords, builtin functions, standard library or documentation? If they have translations of the important documentation and the small number of keywords -- yes, they probably do; the alternative programming languages aren't really all that much easier for non-English speakers. FWIW, I've used undocumented variants of Assembler, based only on examples. (So no doc, didn't have a complete set of keywords/functions/libraries, misundstood some of what I did have.) I won't say it was a great environment, but it did work. -jJ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
